Truly, I looked at a lot, but drove nothing outside Mazda this time, as nearly everything else has a CVT, or was one of the Koreans, (on whose cars I am not sold in terms of long-term quality). I do not want either an Escape or Bronco Sport and upcharges and wait times on Mavericks are stupid.
We went in looking for a CX-5 Turbo and the seats, (in particular the front passenger seat), were deal killers.
CX9/90 is too big, and like our other vehicle, Flex, so that was out.
I was disappointed that I liked the CX-50 so much. After all, it was bigger, heavier, more expensive, slower, had less content for the money when lining up packages… I walked in wanting to hate it.
Except, I always wanted a Subaru Outback. I love wagons. The more I looked at the CX-50, the more like a Volvo wagon or Outback it became. Except here was a stylish interior, a turbo and no friggin CVT.
Ride height is perfect. We love the ingress/egress of the wide back doors for our old parents and big puppy. We appreciate the cabin and it’s extra width over the CX-5. We both like the terra-cotta leather, which is polarizing, but we like it. The seats are better for our American butts, (we’re pretty average people). I don’t perceive the torsion beam as a downside in terms of handling between the 5 and 50, driven back to back.
What I miss, every time I drive the car, is a good stereo and power folding mirrors. If we could find a way to get Bose and mirrors on the base Turbo, it would be about perfect for me.
I don’t miss all the other goo-gaws or the higher monthlies that result from the PP package, (we spent some time in one so-equipped, and meh), so I’ll content myself to remember, as I round the corner heading for 50, I shouldn’t be playing the radio loudly, anyhow.
We went in looking for a CX-5 Turbo and the seats, (in particular the front passenger seat), were deal killers.
CX9/90 is too big, and like our other vehicle, Flex, so that was out.
I was disappointed that I liked the CX-50 so much. After all, it was bigger, heavier, more expensive, slower, had less content for the money when lining up packages… I walked in wanting to hate it.
Except, I always wanted a Subaru Outback. I love wagons. The more I looked at the CX-50, the more like a Volvo wagon or Outback it became. Except here was a stylish interior, a turbo and no friggin CVT.
Ride height is perfect. We love the ingress/egress of the wide back doors for our old parents and big puppy. We appreciate the cabin and it’s extra width over the CX-5. We both like the terra-cotta leather, which is polarizing, but we like it. The seats are better for our American butts, (we’re pretty average people). I don’t perceive the torsion beam as a downside in terms of handling between the 5 and 50, driven back to back.
What I miss, every time I drive the car, is a good stereo and power folding mirrors. If we could find a way to get Bose and mirrors on the base Turbo, it would be about perfect for me.
I don’t miss all the other goo-gaws or the higher monthlies that result from the PP package, (we spent some time in one so-equipped, and meh), so I’ll content myself to remember, as I round the corner heading for 50, I shouldn’t be playing the radio loudly, anyhow.